|
November 22, 2005 - 4:22 p.m. hypothesis 1: a) thinking of getting the thinker interesting dichotomy. I feel more so that the obvious flirt, is less apologetic, takes innitiative and doesn't beat around the bush. They know what they want, lay it on the table, brazen maybe, but not repentant for wanting interactions, even sex. but not always sex. I'm not under any illusion that being flirtatious is often slotted alongside being a player. but you've gotta have a ball or two in your hands to be 'playing' ... I see the 'hunter' 'pursuer' (as long as they're not a 'gatherer')as someone who provides for themself, if self-sufficient and doesn't sit back letting opportunities pass them by, waiting for girls to fall into their lap. I guess I'm not a big fan of complacency. at any rate. why do people make so much of superficial actions. If I seem to flirt, how does one rate that in 'seriousness'? Don't flatter yourself. I don't want you "THAT BAD". at the same time, points out the angel on my shoulder, it's superficial to even be bothered what some person (alright... PEOPLE) who don't even know me think, without ever having spoken to me. If they stick around long enough they'll figure it out. some of it anyways. and become gradually less amazed that I'm a well-rounded person... who sometimes almost loses sleep over the perceptions people have of her. Unfounded or not. I am a flirt. I am a good friend. I am the best daughter. As a partner, I'm hell, but worth every second (I hope). And as far as my cat is concerned I am the nicest girl alive.
|